Though I subscribe to them, I've had it with the so-called 'design' blogs and their unending streams of linked lists. Let's forget for now how much of a hassle it is to be able to keep references to all of these individual posts, since designers who blog probably can't be bothered with using a wiki, since they're so gawd-awfully hideous. No, let's just talk about quality of content. It bothers me that gradients and starbursts are presented as exemplary design. From the content on these blogs, you'd think to design a better frontend web interface, all it takes are some grunge textures, drop shadows, and large social networking and syndication icons. Though I'd have to conclude from the standpoint of sensible, human-friendly design, that concoction just makes it a gawdy, user experience nightmare. There's a reason the websites of most agencies and professionals stay clean of such fads. WordPress theme designers take heed.
Bottom line. The web designer in me is more interested in real innovations in user-friendly interface design. And the print designer in me is more interested ways for layout to highlight and enhance content. Neither side really cares about textures and gradients. Under most circumstances they're benefits are not worth their weight. Expect a link to a list of resources and articles, on a wiki page.